About Me

Name: john prange
Email: jpscoins@mei.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Essay Contest -- Money Does Grow on Trees

In trying to teach their kids financial responsibility, parents used to say, "Money doesn't grow on trees." In other words, money had to be earned; nobody was going to just give it to you. But paper does come from trees, and the Federal Reserve chairman has vowed to print as much paper money as necessary to stimulate the economy.  If our government-sanctioned Federal Reserve can just print money to give to banks to loan out at interest, why can't Congress just instruct the Federal Reserve to print enough money to make every American wealthy? A pre-1921 silver dollar and once ounce of silver bullion will be awarded by JP's Coins & Collectibles to the author of the best essay answering that question. Send your essays of 500 words or less to Essay Contest, JP's Coins & Collectibles, 420 S. Burdick St., Kalamazoo, MI 49007. Deadline for entries is the 4th of July.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Give me liberty or give me debt

While our descent from liberty to servitude proceeds at an ever-quickening pace, perhaps we can ascertain the crux of the problem by harkening back to the final days of the 2008 Presidential campaign.

Sharing the headlines with the candidates at the time was the bill to use $700 billion of the people's money to bail out corrupt, financially irresponsible banks. This bill had been defeated once in Congress, due to overwhelming bipartisan opposition by millions of people who took the time to let their congressmen know how they felt. Chief promoter of the bill, Henry Paulsen, U.S. Treasurer and former head of banking giant Goldman-Sachs, continued to twist congressional arms, and the bill quickly resurfaced, this time laden with $100 billion of extra fat to entice our more piggish representatives. At this point, many of us naively and idealistically expected one if not both of the presidential candidates to take the side of the people. Neither Obama nor McCain did.

Instead, both candidates gave nearly identical speeches -- it would probably be more accurate to say they read scripts -- in support of the bill, which passed the second time around. I had the distinct impression that the talking points on this subject had been provided to the candidates, as well as to Congress, by someone in Henry Paulsen's office, most likely written by someone in the Goldman-Sachs public relations department. All supporters of this heist, including Obama and McCain, were using the same catch phrases and buzz words -- "free up the credit markets . . . student loans . . . auto loans . . . loans to businesses so they can meet their payrolls, blah, blah, blah . . ." In other words, it was vitally important that America maintain its addiction to borrowed money.

Further evidence that the banking community is in control of our government came when President Obama appointed a Paulsen accomplice in the bank "bailout," Timothy Geithner, to head the so-called new and improved administration's Treasury Department. That is not change. Real change would mean putting someone in Treasury who has more allegiance to the people who supply the Treasury with money than those who take it.

Though we are losing money and liberty to this new government of the bankers, by the bankers, and for the bankers, we are gaining a deeper understanding of what Thomas Jefferson meant when he warned that "banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies."

Today our most powerful banking institution, and thus the biggest threat to our liberty, is the Federal Reserve, created by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which was most likely passed by congressmen who received large donations from bankers. Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr., father of the famous pilot, said, "When the President signs this Act, the invisible government by the money power will be legalized."

Of all the Republicans and Democrats who ran for President in 2007-2008, only one, Congressman Ron Paul of Texas, understood the relationship between our Federal Reserve ("Fedzilla," as some call it) money system and America's financial crisis. Recently he introduced a bill, HR 833, which would repeal the Federal Reserve Act and abolish the Federal Reserve.

 

"From the Great Depression, to the stagflation of the seventies, to the current economic crisis caused by
the housing bubble," Paul said, "every economic downturn suffered by this country over the past century can be
traced to Federal Reserve policy. The Fed has followed a consistent policy of flooding the economy
with easy money, leading to a misallocation of resources and an artificial 'boom' followed by a
recession or depression when the Fed-created bubble bursts."

More than our pocketbooks and retirement accounts are threatened by the current economic crisis. Powerful people in powerful places are using this occasion to tranfer power from the people to an elite ruling class who feel they are more qualified to spend our money than we are. One man, Ron Paul, is trying to transfer power back to the people.

"The borrower is servant to the lender," as it says in the Book of Proverbs. The bankers and their allies in Congress seem determined to make servants of us all. Let them know that you prefer liberty. Let them know that you support HR 833.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A fairness dividend that would revive economy

Honest, financially responsible citizens will be marching with pitchforks and torches on Washington and Wall Street if the newly nationalized banking system provides irresponsible borrowers with lower mortgage interest rates than the rates being paid by those who faithfully make the mortgage payments every month, year after year.  However, there is a  way to help overextended borrowers stay in their homes without being unfair to the rest of us -- 3 percent interest rates for everybody making house payments.
 
In addition to being fair, such an across-the-board lowering of interest rates would stimulate the housing industry and the whole economy. It would make housing affordable for more people and minimize the foreclosure epidemic while at the same time raising home values. Such a  plan would also put a couple of hundred extra dollars a month in the hands of millions of consumers, which would revive the consumer spending on which our economy -- the auto industry,  restaurants, retailers, etc. -- thrives.
 
President Bush could improve his tarnished reputation by directing banking czar Henry Paulsen to make this economic stimulus plan happen. If Bush won't do it as a going away present to the people, Obama and his allies in the House and Senate could make it happen. Across-the-board 3 percent mortgage interest rates would be a fair and feasible plan. Perhaps its greatest feature is that it restore a measure of credibility to the government and the banking system.
 
We will see which is stronger -- the government of the people or the invisible government of  bankers. Let your representatives know which one you prefer. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Founding fathers tried to prevent financial crisis

In pondering the current financial-congressional scandal, the following quotes from some of America's early leaders might help shed light:

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies." -- Thomas Jefferson

"If ever again our nation stumbles upon unfunded paper, it shall surely be like death to our body politic. This country will crash." -- George Washington

"I am firmly of the opinion that there never was a paper pound, a paper dollar, or a paper promise of any kind, that ever yet obtained a general currency but by force or fraud, generally by both." -- John Adams

"Of all the contrivances devised for cheating the laboring classes of mankind, none has been more effective than that which deludes him with paper money." -- Daniel Webster

Those are some of the reasons they put this in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution: "No state shall make anything but gold or silver coin a tender in payment of debts." That clause was negated in 1913 by the Federal Reserve Act, which was most likely passed by congressmen, like congressmen today, who received large donations from bankers. When this Act passed, Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr., father of the famous pilot, said, "When the President signs this Act, the invisible government by the money power will be legalized."

As Andy Naylor put it in an article titled "Federal Reserve Fraud," when Woodrow Wilson signed the Act into law, he gave our country's money system "to a group of private bankers and allowed them to create money by making bookkeeping entries, loan it at interest, and take title to real property as collateral. Because of this, the citizens of the United States have lost control over their money system and their government."

Over the years, critics of this new system were increasingly villified, marginalized, lunafied, and silenced. Of all the Republicans and Democrats who ran for President this year, only one, Congressman Ron Paul of Texas, understood the relationship between our Federal Reserve ("Fedzilla," as some call it) money system and America's financial crisis. He was derided by the establishment media and other powerbrokers, which reminds me of something Gustave Le Bon said in his study, "The Crowd:"

"The masses have never thirsted after truth. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim."

But the truth is a stubborn thing, and the current financial crisis is helping to reveal it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Prayer for Obama and the Nation

Most of us who opposed his candidacy are now praying that God will bless Barrack Obama with good health and sound judgement. And, as we look towards Washington with our hands outstretched and hope in our hearts, let's pray also that the new administration, in redistributing the wealth of rich Americans to improve life for the rest of us, will make distinctions between those who earned their wealth honestly and those who didn't.

I can see the common good of confiscating the wealth of rich crooks, which would include many congressmen as well as some of their cronies in high finance. However, redistributing the wealth of those who earned it fair and square through hard work in school and on the job could have unintended negative consequences. For example, it might encourage some of our nation's top producers and job providers to flee to countries which reward success rather than penalizing it -- a flight of the golden geese, so to speak. This could result in a loss of freedom, prosperity, and opportunity for those left behind.

As we pray for our new leaders, let us pray also that we don't go so far down the road to Socialism that we can't turn back. The road is paved with golden promises, but it ends in dependency and mediocrity. God bless Barrack Obama, and God bless America.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »